Ombudsman Stands Firm: Awaiting Impeachment Verdict in VP Sara Duterte's Case
"Ombudsman Stands Firm: Awaiting Impeachment Verdict in VP Sara Duterte's Case"
In a turn of events that underscores the intricate dance of power and procedure in Philippine politics, the House of Representatives prosecution panel has expressed strong support for Ombudsman Samuel Martires' decision to await the Senate's verdict on the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte before advancing any prosecutorial actions. This decision, articulated with a blend of legal precision and political acumen, was discussed in detail at the Saturday News Forum by Atty. Antonio Audie Bucoy, the panel's spokesperson.
"Ang sinabi niya (Martires) ang kaniyang kapangyarihan lang ay mag-imbestiga, hindi ang mag-desisyon," Bucoy stated, emphasizing the Ombudsman's role as an investigator rather than a decider. This sentiment echoes a broader understanding of the separation of powers within the Philippine government, a theme that resonates deeply in the current political climate. Bucoy further commended Martires for his adherence to protocol, stating, "Aantayin niya ang kahihinatnan ng impeachment trial, which is tama."
The backdrop to this legal drama is as compelling as it is complex. On June 19, Ombudsman Martires requested Vice President Duterte to submit a counter-affidavit in response to allegations concerning the misuse of confidential funds within the Department of Education and the Office of the Vice President. Duterte complied, filing her counter-affidavit on June 27, 2025, a move that adds another layer of intrigue to the unfolding narrative.
Martires, in a candid interview, clarified that his office lacks the authority to prosecute, a statement that underscores the procedural nuances of Philippine law. He noted, "The Ombudsman or any investigating body has to await the result of the impeachment proceeding." This procedural deference is critical, as it delineates the boundaries of judicial and legislative responsibilities. Should the Senate impeachment court rule in favor of Duterte, the Ombudsman’s hands would be tied, as Martires pointedly remarked, "But if the Vice President is acquitted by the impeachment court, wala kaming power to charge her".
The allegations, as detailed in a report submitted by the House Committee on Good Governance and Public Accountability on June 16, are grave. They encompass charges of plunder, technical malversation, falsification, use of falsified documents, perjury, bribery, corruption of public officers, betrayal of public trust, and culpable violation of the Constitution. The list of respondents reads like a who’s who of bureaucratic power, including Edward Fajarda and Gina Acosta, Special Disbursing Officers; Atty. Sunshine Charry Fajarda, Assistant Secretary; retired Major General Nolasco Mempin, Undersecretary for Administration; and Annalyn Sevilla, Undersecretary for Finance Service, all from the Department of Education. From the Office of the Vice President, the charges extend to Atty. Zuleika Lopez, Undersecretary and Chief of Staff; Lemuel Ortonio, Assistant Chief of Staff; Lieutenant Colonel Dennis Nolasco, Vice Presidential Security and Protection Group; and Colonel Raymund Dante Lachia, Commander of the Vice Presidential Security and Protection Group of the Philippine Army.
The investigation, Martires admitted, might outlast his tenure, which is set to conclude on July 26 after a seven-year term. This admission adds a layer of temporal tension to the proceedings, suggesting that the resolution of this case might rest with his successor. "Mabuti nagsalita na si Ombudsman Martires that he is leaving it to the next Ombudsman to address the case… We welcome that because 'yun po ang tamang proseso eh," Bucoy remarked, acknowledging the procedural correctness of Martires' stance.
As the political and legal saga unfolds, the nation watches with bated breath, aware that the outcome could reshape the landscape of Philippine governance. The stakes are high, and the players are seasoned, making this a pivotal moment in the annals of the country's political history.
🔮 Fortellr Predicts
Confidence: 85%
The ongoing impeachment proceedings against Vice President Sara Duterte are poised to significantly impact the political landscape of the Philippines. In the short term, the decision by Ombudsman Samuel Martires to await the Senate's verdict before advancing any criminal prosecutions is likely to intensify media scrutiny and public discourse surrounding the issues of governance and accountability. The procedural deference shown by the Ombudsman highlights a robust adherence to constitutional protocols, potentially reinforcing trust in the legislative process among various stakeholders. Within the political establishment, the House’s supportive stance towards the Ombudsman is expected to promote cohesion among lawmakers who are keen on demonstrating procedural propriety while awaiting the impeachment outcome. In the longer term, the resolution of the impeachment could either bolster Sara Duterte’s position if she is acquitted, thereby aiding her political capital, or precipitate a realignment among political actors should she be found guilty, potentially catalyzing a shift in alliances and the emergence of new political figures vying for influence. Economically, the trial may cause short-term volatility in markets, particularly in sectors sensitive to political uncertainty, such as the financial and investment sectors. However, unless the trial leads to significant revelations of malfeasance, any economic disruptions are expected to be contained. Moreover, should the outcome curtail Duterte's political prospects, it could open avenues for reforms that might otherwise be stalled, impacting regulatory frameworks and economic policy directions.